Clark County EOP Basic Plan 5. Command and Control Table 5-1 Comparison of Single Incident Commander and Unified Commander Single Incident Commander Unified Command execute integrated incident operations and maximize the use of assigned resources. Source: ICS-300: Intermediate ICS for Expanding Incident Student Manual. A Policy Group will serve in an advisory function within Unified Command in the MACC. This group is composed of the following:  Board of Commissioners  County Manager  Emergency Manager  District Attorney  Incorporated cities representatives (if participating in a Unified Command)  Special districts representatives (if participating in a Unified Command)  Representatives from State or federal agencies involved in the response Figure 5-1 Example of Unified Command for Clark County Policy Group/ Unified Command Stakeholders Board of County Commissioners, Appropriate County Agency Leads Local/County Agency Executives(s), Appropriate District Leads State Agency Director(s), Primary Appropriate State Agency Leads Federal Officer(s) Joint Public Information Officer ESF Liaisons Local, County, Tribal, (resource providers) State, Federal Local, County, Tribal, State, Federal Safety Officer(s) Operations Section* Planning Section* Logistics Section* Finance/Administration Supported by Branches, May be supported by the May be supported by the Section* Divisions, Groups and Units following Units: Capacity following Units: Supply, Facilities, May be supported by the following reflecting operational activity (resource availability), Situation, Shelters, Communications, Food, Units: Compensation/Claims, Cost, specific to an incident Documentation, Medical, Transportation Time, Procurement Deployment/Demobilization *Note: In any type of incident, a Section Chief may be assigned a Deputy. In addition, an Intelligence Section would be incorporated into the command structure in response to incidents of national significance or those presumed or confirmed to be terrorist-related. 5-3